my project folders
Too broad use SEXUAL
INTRO
In the 80s, when Admin m. was a child, there was the
realization of the Freedom that was dreamed of in the 60s.
Sexual experimentation was considered healthy, people were
openly, and here in Holland, happily Gay.
Now, in the 2020s the attitude has changed. After the 80s
there came Hiv/Aids, fear of sex. And now with people
interacting with peers and kids there is the matter of
bullying, exploitation and a massive amount of unwanted
porn, sextortion, revenge porn & kiddie porn.
DICTIONARY
The thing is, the point of this project…
While admin m. knows better than most about rape,
abuse, incest (I ran Phantom about these, 2017-2022),
there is this ITCH about the broad use of the word SEXUAL.
According to the THE Dutch dictionary vanDale sexual means:
o “referring to sexual intercourse”
Biologically, this does not even include gay anal.
Even though the law on rape is about penetration,
it does not mention sexual. It can be mouth or anal too.
The ITCH about the word sexual is that in the 60s the
word sexual became normal, but to refer to behaviour, health
and identity. All about adults engaging in actual sex.
THE LAW
By now, 60yrs later, in the 2020s the word sexual has
acquired a life of its own.
While admin m. agrees that abuse in the context, like
verbal abuse after engaging in sex is sexual abuse,
we will focus here on the use of the word sexual in the
context of children.
Children cannot have biological sex, because they are
infertile, just like older women.
In the current age, it is normal to connect the terms
sexual abuse to imagery and circumstances that include
nothing more than nudity, intimate parts & masturbation.
Admin. M. from the 80s feels betrayed by this conservative
and closed minded treatment of mere imagery.
Masturbation is healthy and normal, admin m. was told
by 80s media. Admin m. has a hard time to believe it.
But for Christ's sake don't act, in law, as if it's not!!
CONCLUSION
For admin, dictionary wins from closed minded law.
More…
=
Related
The relationship between a medium and the values associated with it can be complex. When a newer medium emerges, it often brings with it new values, practices, and ways of communication that can overshadow or replace those of the older medium. However, this does not necessarily mean that the values associated with the older medium completely disappear.
1. Evolution of Values: Some values may evolve rather than disappear. For example, the rise of digital media has changed how we value immediacy and accessibility, but traditional values like craftsmanship in print media may still be appreciated.
2. Nostalgia and Preservation: As new mediums emerge, there can be a sense of nostalgia for older ones. This can lead to a revival of interest in the older medium, along with its associated values. For instance, vinyl records have seen a resurgence in popularity, with many valuing the tactile experience and sound quality.
3. Hybridization: New mediums often incorporate elements of older ones, leading to a hybridization of values. For example, social media platforms may adopt storytelling techniques from traditional journalism while also introducing new forms of engagement.
4. Cultural Context: The values associated with a medium can also be influenced by cultural context. In some cases, older mediums may retain significance in certain communities or contexts, even as newer ones dominate.
5. Critical Reflection: The transition from one medium to another can prompt critical reflection on the values of both. This can lead to a reassessment of what is valued in communication, art, and culture.
In summary, while newer mediums can shift the landscape of values, the older mediums and their associated values may persist, evolve, or be reinterpreted in various ways.