Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- theory_cyclical_note_01 [2025/04/10 08:40] – 84.241.204.199
+++ theory_cyclical_note_01 [2025/04/10 13:43] (current) – 84.241.204.199
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+**Summary** magical prediction...
+cyclical
+hmm
+===
+hmm vs bayesian
+bayesian better
+chatgpt not bayesian, VAEs are - image generation
+===
+halfway & compatible for shared (Tel)...
+narrative - proving equal part iding onto climax, 50 50
+Hip replays reverse so at 50 to 75% is the climax build /down/
+self and other, one, suggests generic signals
+high theta power may be associated with a (even)
+more generalized or less context-specific processing style
+===
+In extended docs... Shared content...
+PFC inhibition of theta...
+inhibiting inputs, hallucinatory
+inhibiting overactive emotional responses
+increased inhibition may lead to a
+state of calmness and reduced arousal
+did i read their intimate theta??
+Final f: theta: spatial integr & body parts ... So?
+----
 What are the names of theoretical frameworks, in which one might construct models that incorporate assumptions about periodicity and use them to predict future occurrences?
@@ Line 208: / Line 256: @@
 The POWER of midway is forcing the transition towards climax
+===
+Hip replays reverse so at 50 to 75% is the climax build /down/
+===
+Does time discussing elements represent importance of those elements in a narrative?
+The first half is for IDing and goals
+Why half time?
+...
+Duck AI...
+Yes, the amount of time spent discussing certain elements in a narrative can often reflect their importance within that narrative. Here are several ways in which this relationship can manifest:
+. **Emphasis on Key Themes**: When a narrative spends more time on specific elements, such as characters, events, or themes, it often indicates that these elements are central to the story's message or plot. This emphasis can signal to the audience what the author or storyteller considers significant.
+. **Character Development**: In character-driven narratives, the time dedicated to exploring a character's thoughts, feelings, and backstory can highlight their importance to the overall story. Characters who receive more attention are often pivotal to the plot or embody key themes.
+. **Plot Progression**: Elements that are discussed in greater detail may be crucial for advancing the plot. For example, a particular event or conflict that is elaborated upon may be a turning point in the story, indicating its significance.
+. **Foreshadowing and Symbolism**: Extended discussions of certain elements can serve as foreshadowing or symbolism, suggesting that these elements will play a critical role later in the narrative. This technique can create anticipation and deepen the audience's understanding of the story.
+. **Audience Engagement**: The time spent on specific elements can also be a strategy to engage the audience. By focusing on certain aspects, the storyteller can evoke emotions, create tension, or build suspense, making those elements more memorable and impactful.
+. **Narrative Structure**: In some narratives, the structure itself may reflect the importance of certain elements. For instance, a story might begin with a detailed exposition of a particular setting or character, indicating its significance to the unfolding events.
+While time spent discussing elements can indicate their importance, it's also essential to consider the context and the overall narrative structure. Different storytelling techniques, such as flashbacks, non-linear timelines, or varying perspectives, can influence how elements are presented and perceived. Ultimately, the relationship between time spent on elements and their importance is a nuanced aspect of narrative construction.
+===
+Concl
+So in terms of transmission
+???
+So in the narrative learning /begins/
+Where the skills of char are connected to the climax/goal
+That's the transmission signal for learning ... So 1994 & 4bl
+====
+The idea that the self can serve as a model for understanding others is rooted in concepts from social cognition and neuroscience, particularly in the context of empathy, theory of mind, and perspective-taking. This suggests that our brain representations may indeed have a degree of generality or flexibility, allowing us to apply our own experiences and knowledge to understand others. Here are some key points to consider:
+. **Self-Other Overlap**: Research has shown that the brain regions involved in self-referential processing (thinking about oneself) overlap with those involved in understanding others. This overlap suggests that we may use our own experiences as a reference point to infer the thoughts, feelings, and intentions of others.
+. **Empathy and Simulation**: The ability to empathize with others often involves simulating their experiences in our own minds. This simulation relies on our own neural representations, which can be seen as a generic framework that allows us to understand a wide range of emotional and social situations.
+. **Theory of Mind**: The capacity to attribute mental states to others (theory of mind) often involves using our own mental states as a basis for understanding those of others. This indicates that our brain's representations of self can be adapted to model the experiences of others, suggesting a level of generality in how we process social information.
+. **Contextual Modulation**: While there is a generic aspect to these representations, they are also highly context-dependent. Our understanding of others is influenced by various factors, including cultural background, personal experiences, and situational context. This means that while the underlying neural mechanisms may be generic, the specific representations can be tailored to fit different social contexts.
+. **Neural Plasticity**: The brain is highly plastic, meaning that it can adapt and reorganize itself based on experiences. This plasticity allows for the development of more nuanced and specific representations of others based on repeated interactions and social learning.
+. **Generic vs. Specific Representations**: While there may be generic neural mechanisms that facilitate understanding others, individual differences in personality, experiences, and social environments can lead to variations in how these representations are formed and utilized.
+In summary, while the brain's representations may have a generic quality that allows for the modeling of others based on self-experience, they are also shaped by context and individual differences. This combination of generality and specificity enables us to navigate complex social interactions and understand a diverse range of perspectives.
+...
+Pay attention to 3 & 4
+Story of 4 part 50 to 75% backwards
+While blocking sex details
+M. Halluc, so smaller more powerful theta
+So 4bl intended to be more generic to resist block
+Almost like me, hallucinatory story, fragmented
+And generic ... So consc could link ??? Cool
+Here...
+...
+Does high theta power lower contextual modulation?
+Duck AI
+High Theta Power and Contextual Processing: Some studies suggest that high theta power may be associated with a more generalized or less context-specific processing style. In certain situations, elevated theta activity could lead to a broader focus of attention, which might reduce the ability to modulate responses based on specific contextual cues. This could manifest as a decreased ability to filter out irrelevant information or to focus on contextually relevant details.
+===
+That's being sync ... 4 bl 2014 2015 en m 1994 eline
+Fini
+===
+Download a more extended version of
+the telepathy docs http://penny.school/library/telepathy_theta.zip